tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163829887162955058.post2275955963674078342..comments2024-01-01T11:51:53.860-08:00Comments on Babbles from Scott Eagan: When do you revise?Scott Eaganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17209357682070126879noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163829887162955058.post-34971544585718136862008-06-06T07:56:00.000-07:002008-06-06T07:56:00.000-07:00Cancice,I would certainly agree that getting a res...Cancice,<BR/><BR/>I would certainly agree that getting a response back from an editor or agent with specifics is great, but remember, unless they say to send it back again, in most cases, you are stucuk with that rejection.<BR/><BR/>What I am recommending is to not rush things. Sometimes the comments are simply due to a writer submitting to the wrong house that would never have "gotten it."Scott Eaganhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17209357682070126879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1163829887162955058.post-39438739035153114052008-06-05T10:00:00.000-07:002008-06-05T10:00:00.000-07:00I think one reason so many authors jump on the rev...I think one reason so many authors jump on the revision suggestions is because of the dreaded form letter.<BR/><BR/>It's such a rare thing to actually get FEEDBACK with a rejection, the mind set is simply "Look, they like it enough to comment, so they must want it... and I must make it what they want to secure that sale!" <BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, many times, in the quest for the holy contract sale, the story can lose it's intergrity.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18274178330113713370noreply@blogger.com