Now don't get me wrong. There are indeed complete idiots out there reviewing books. I get it! The do need to be flogged! But, with that said, who is to say they weren't right and the people who raved about your book were wrong. We cannot simply return to the theory of "majority rules". Remember there are a lot of things in history that were decided on majority rules that were indeed wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d9ed/5d9edb485011c426884fa1c3428757f8d8ba67b9" alt=""
At that conference, I was teaching a session on expanding our approaches to editing. One of the points I brought up was the issue of writing in our own bubble. Too often, writers have tunnel vision when it comes to their writing. We are too close to what we write so there are many times when we simply cannot see the flaws in the story. It is for this reason that we have to listen to ALL of the critique out there.
By looking at both the positive and negative feedback. By truthfully listening to the good and the bad, we have a chance to see how other people view our writing. It is a different set of eyes and can, if you do it properly, add to your ability to reach out to readers.
Instead of disregarding these people. Listen and learn.
You might be surprised at what you can do to improve your writing.
I think critiques by other writers AND readers are important to me. The separate groups usually find completely different problems with my work.
ReplyDeleteI used to get angry and now I look at it as another step towards being a better writer. For someone to take the time to give you any feedback either good or bad is a gift in a way. I am attending my first RWA in NJ this weekend and I am so excited to get both negative and positive feedback.
ReplyDelete