This is always a sticky issue but I think one that requires special attention. Here is the scenario:
You have received a letter back from an editor or agent passing on a project. Still, you seem to think that your story might still work there, or that something was confusing in the letter. How do you respond?
As I said, this is sticky business. It is important that you get all of the information that you can regarding that manuscript since that is a great way to improve your writing. But how do you get it? Agents and editors do understand this, but in many cases, are afraid of replying to messages like this since it opens up a dialogue. For some reason, many writers take advantage of this opportunity and continue to reply and re-reply. While the intentions to dig deeper and figure out why the project didn't work are there, in the end, all it does is ruin your chances for any future workings with that editor or agent. Remember, we do keep a log or database on all submissions.
If you wish to question something, it needs to be constructive and not challenging. Making the editor or agent defend their decision is not constructive. Ask for further clarifcation on 1 issue. Not the entire letter.
Secondly, this is done via an email. Phone calls are a no-no. The editors and agents are busy with their own clients and meetings and that time is precious.
Third - If you get a regjection, this does not mean that with future projects you can submit different material. In other words, you can not send a full manuscript now, or be considered on proposal. You have to go through all of the same steps again.
You have to remember that sometimes a first project just isn't right but a follow up can be great. Don't ruin your chances with stupidity.
Scott
No comments:
Post a Comment